- 01
Welcome to the Online Course Platform for MGMT 608:
The Doctoral Course in Strategic Management
This section provides information about the course outline, resources, requirements and grading system. Please read this carefully before proceeding.
1. Course Outline: We will be covering six carefully selected chapters. These six pre-selected consecutive chapters are comprehensive in representing the core of the strategic management domain.T o view the course outline, please click HERE.
3. Resources: The main resource for this course is the textbook: 'Strategy: An International Perspective' 6th eds. by Bob de Wit. Although an electronic copy of the textbook can be found on the MGMT608 main course page, click on the image or link below for quick and convenient access.
The focal text book was deliberately designed to be very well suited to doctoral courses on strategic management. This is because, unlike conventional textbooks, every chapter in this text, represents one of the core streams of strategic management research and is structured to have two parts: a conceptual part and a scientific part. In other words, every chapter begins with a conceptual discussion of the most salient concepts and paradoxes of the specific topic and ends with a presentation of a minimum of three seminal research papers from the body of research that shaped thought within that domain.
3. Course and Assessment Structure: Following the structure of the text, this course is organized in a way that gives students the opportunity to interact with core domain concepts as well as the seminal scientific papers which helped shape each of the domains. This provides a great approach to simultaneously introduce students to the concept of strategic management while exposing them in an orderly and guided fashion to seminal scientific research in the field of strategic management.
Requirements: You will be required to attend weekly lectures, take a midterm exam, complete a group presentation, and jointly produce a research term paper.
3. Grading System: In light of the above, the new grading system is now as follows:
(a) Midterm Exams: 30%
(b) Group Presentations: 20%
(c) Final Group Term Paper and Presentation: 50%
To begin, click on the 'WEEK 2' section tab below this section.
Please do not hesitate to contact me via email- lawrenceemeagwali@gau.edu.tr if you have any questions
- 02
Understanding the Nature of Strategy
The topic for this week is 'understanding the nature of strategy'. This topic succinctly covered in chapter 1 of the assigned text aims at providing an introduction to the field of strategic management and instead of restricting the reader to one strict conceptualization of strategy, it tries to do this through the lens of multiple strategy and management theories, providing the reader with an array of perspectives and insights which reflects the true nature of strategy as a discipline.
Readings: This week, you are required to read chapter 1 of the text. This chapter as with all other chapters is divided into two parts: the conceptual discussions part and the scientific research part containing three seminal research papers. The most important set of readings is the fist part (the conceptual part) as the seminal research papers presented in the second (scientific) part of the chapter are only provided as a reference and for indepth understanding of concepts explained in the conceptual part of the chapter. Never-the-less you are required to at the very least skim and scan through all three seminal chapters in preparation for the summaries and assignments. For easy access, click on the image to access both the text and the chapter reading:
Requirements:
Week 1 Summary: You are required to read and provide a 2-page summary of the concepts in no more than 750 words.
Week 1 Assignment: Using Google scholar, search for two recent articles (between 2017 and 2020) on the nature of strategy or strategic management and discuss how the findings from these studies align or diverge from the concepts discussed in this chapter.
Please submit your week 1 summary and assignment no later than 11:59 PM on Tuesday the 21 of December, 2021.
SUBMITTING YOUR SUMMARY AND ASSIGNMENT
To submit your summary and assignments,enrol into the MGMT 608 course on the e-learning platform and submit the following three sets of deliverables:(a) your chapter 1 summary, (b) your assignment and (c) the two research papers you downloaded from the Google Scholar database.
Please do not send the word files directly to my email as our official email addresses have very limited storage. ONLY send assignments through the GAU e-learning platform.
- 03
Strategizing (Strategic Thinking)
This week, we will be focusing on the topic: 'Strategizing or Strategic Thinking'. This topic comprehensively covered in chapter 2 of the assigned text aims at providing a scientific and practical overview of the cognitive processes involved in the development of strategy especially the paradox of ogic and intuition.
Readings: This week, you are required to read chapter 2 of the text. This chapter as with all other chapters is divided into two parts: the conceptual discussions part and the scientific research part containing three seminal research papers. The most important set of readings is the first part (the conceptual part) as the seminal research papers presented in the second (scientific) part of the chapter are only provided as a reference and for indepth understanding of concepts explained in the conceptual part of the chapter. Never-the-less you are required to at the very least skim and scan through all three seminal chapters in preparation for the summaries and assignments. For easy access, click on the textbook's image in the WEEK 1 tab, to access both the text and the chapter reading:
Requirements:
Week 2 Summary: You are required to read and provide a 2-page summary of the concepts with special emphasis on the focal paradox, in no more than 500 words.
Week 2 Assignment: Using Google scholar, search for two recent articles (between 2017 and 2020) on strategizing or strategic thinking and discuss how the findings from these studies align or diverge from the core concepts and paradoxes discussed in this chapter.
Please submit your week 2 summary and assignment no later than 11:59 PM on Tuesday the 28th of December, 2021.
SUBMITTING YOUR SUMMARY AND ASSIGNMENT
To submit your summary and assignments,enrol into the MGMT 608 course on the e-learning platform and submit the following three sets of deliverables:(a) your chapter 2 summary, (b) your assignment and (c) the two research papers you downloaded from the Google Scholar database.
Please do not send the word files directly to my email as our official email addresses have very limited storage. ONLY send assignments through the GAU e-learning platform.
- 04
Missioning & Visioning: The art of setting strategic direction
This week, we turn our attention on the art of setting strategic directions for organizations and the intricate tensions associated with it. This is the focus of chapter 3 of the assigned text and again it aims at providing a scientific and practical overview of the different approaches typically used in developing corporate mission and visions and the inherent tensions involved in particular, the paradox of profitability and responsibility.
Readings: As usual, you are required to read chapter 3 of the text. This chapter as with all other chapters is divided into two parts: the conceptual discussions part and the scientific research part containing three seminal research papers. The most important set of readings is the fist part (the conceptual part) as the seminal research papers presented in the second (scientific) part of the chapter are only provided as a reference and for indepth understanding of concepts explained in the conceptual part of the chapter. Never-the-less you are required to at the very least skim and scan through all three seminal chapters in preparation for the summaries and assignments. For easy access, click on the textbook's image in the WEEK 1 tab, to access both the text and the chapter reading:
Requirements:
Week 3 Summary: You are required to read and provide a 2-page summary of the concepts with special emphasis on the focal paradox, in no more than 500 words.
Week 3 Assignment: Using Google scholar, search for two recent articles (between 2017 and 2020) on CorporateMissions and Visions and discuss how the findings from these studies align with or diverge from the core concepts and paradoxes discussed in this chapter.
Please submit your week 2 summary and assignment no later than 11:59 PM on Tuesday the 4th of January, 2022.
SUBMITTING YOUR SUMMARY AND ASSIGNMENT
To submit your summary and assignments,enrol into the MGMT 608 course on the e-learning platform and submit the following three sets of deliverables:(a) your chapter 3 summary, (b) your assignment and (c) the two research papers you downloaded from the Google Scholar database.
Please do not send the word files directly to my email as our official email addresses have very limited storage. ONLYsend assignments through theGAU e-learning platform.
- 05
Business Level Strategy
The alignment of forces within firms with forces outside of firms has never been as crucial to strategic success as it is in today's business increasingly dynamic business environment. Chapter 4 concerns itself with the debates and paradoxes inherent in the pursuit of strategic alignment between active and trending forces in the external environment and activeforces within the internal environment. As usual, the chapter provides a scientific and practical overview of the different positions and the inherent paradox of the inside-out and outside-in approaches to business level strategy.
Readings: Please read chapter 4 of the text. Again, this chapter as with all other chapters is divided into two parts: the conceptual discussions part and the scientific research part containing three seminal research papers. The most important set of readings is the fist part (the conceptual part) as the seminal research papers presented in the second (scientific) part of the chapter are only provided as a reference and for indepth understanding of concepts explained in the conceptual part of the chapter. Never-the-less you are required to at the very least skim and scan through all three seminal chapters in preparation for the summaries and assignments. For easy access, click on the textbook's image in the WEEK 1 tab, to access both the text and the chapter reading:
Requirements:
Chapter 4 Summary: You are required to read and provide a 2-page summary of the concepts with special emphasis on the focal paradox, in no more than 500 words.
Chapter 4 Assignment: Using Google scholar, search for two recent articles (between 2017 and 2020) on and discuss how the findings from these studies align with or diverge from the core concepts and paradoxes discussed in this chapter.
Please submit your Chapter 4 summary and assignment no later than 11:59 PM on Tuesday the 11th of January, 2022.
SUBMITTING YOUR SUMMARY AND ASSIGNMENT
To submit your summary and assignments,enrol into the MGMT 608 course on the e-learning platform and submit the following three sets of deliverables:(a) your chapter 3 summary, (b) your assignment and (c) the two research papers you downloaded from the Google Scholar database.
Please do not send the word files directly to my email as our official email addresses have very limited storage. ONLYsend assignments through theGAU e-learning platform.
- 06
Corporate Level Strategy
One of the key questions corporations must address on their journey towards growth is how to optimize their portfolio of businesses. Key questions such as the need to enage in corporate configuration activities to generate the optimal corporate fit for all of the firm's businesses and in general, the need to diversify or retrench. Chapter 5 highlights the core debates and paradox regarding the need for responsivenes and synergy during the the corporate configuration process.
Readings: As usual, you are required to read chapter 5 of the text. This chapter as with all other chapters is divided into two parts: the conceptual discussions part and the scientific research part containing three seminal research papers. The most important set of readings is the fist part (the conceptual part) as the seminal research papers presented in the second (scientific) part of the chapter are only provided as a reference and for indepth understanding of concepts explained in the conceptual part of the chapter. Never-the-less you are required to at the very least skim and scan through all three seminal chapters in preparation for the summaries and assignments. For easy access, click on the textbook's image in the WEEK 1 tab, to access both the text and the chapter reading:
Requirements:
Chapter 5 Summary: You are required to read and provide a 2-page summary of the concepts with special emphasis on the focal paradox, in no more than 500 words.
Chapter 5 Assignment: Using Google scholar, search for two recent articles (between 2017 and 2020) on CorporateLevel Strategy and discuss how the findings from these studies align with or diverge from the core concepts and paradoxes discussed in this chapter.
Please submit your week 2 summary and assignment no later than 11:59 PM on 18th January 2022.
SUBMITTING YOUR SUMMARY AND ASSIGNMENT
To submit your summary and assignments,enrol into the MGMT 608 course on the e-learning platform and submit the following three sets of deliverables:(a) your chapter 3 summary, (b) your assignment and (c) the two research papers you downloaded from the Google Scholar database.
Please do not send the word files directly to my email as our official email addresses have very limited storage. ONLYsend assignments through theGAU e-learning platform.
- 07
Perhaps one of the most important phases of the strategy development process is the 'strategy formation' or formulation phase. Although both terminologies used in describing this stage sound similar and are sometimes used interchangeably, the mean two different things conceptually, and represent the core debate within this stream of strategy research. These debates pertain to the deliberate or intended design of strategy (formulation) on the one hand, and the non-deliberate, unintended or realized emergence of strategy (formation). Chapter 7 concentrates on exploring this paradox especially the position of proponent and opponents as well as complementarity of both terms.
Readings: Once more, you are required to read chapter 7 of the text. The chapter as with all other chapters is divided into two parts: the conceptual discussions part and the scientific research part containing three seminal research papers. The most important set of readings is the fist part (the conceptual part) as the seminal research papers presented in the second (scientific) part of the chapter are only provided as a reference and for indepth understanding of concepts explained in the conceptual part of the chapter. Never-the-less you are required to at the very least skim and scan through all three seminal chapters in preparation for the summaries and assignments. For easy access, click on the textbook's image in the WEEK 1 tab, to access both the text and the chapter reading:
Requirements:
Chapter 7 Summary: You are required to read and provide a 2-page summary of the concepts with special emphasis on the focal paradox, in no more than 500 words.
Chapter 7 Assignment: Using Google scholar, search for two recent articles (between 2017 and 2020) on and discuss how the findings from these studies align with or diverge from the core concepts and paradoxes discussed in this chapter.
Please submit your week 2 summary and assignment no later than 11:59 PM on the 25th January, 2022.
SUBMITTING YOUR SUMMARY AND ASSIGNMENT
To submit your summary and assignments,enrol into the MGMT 608 course on the e-learning platform and submit the following three sets of deliverables:(a) your chapter 3 summary, (b) your assignment and (c) the two research papers you downloaded from the Google Scholar database.
Please do not send the word files directly to my email as our official email addresses have very limited storage. ONLYsend assignments through theGAU e-learning platform.
- 08
You will be required as a group, to submit a term paper reviewing recent literature (2017-2020) on your assigned topic in no more than 800 words, and not exceeding 4 pages. The deadline for submitting the term paper is the 1st of February, 2022
In addition, your paper should be typed using the Times New Roman font, 12pt and double spaced. Should contain in-text citations and end-text referencing using the APA format. Your paper should contain the following three sections:
(1 page long)
(1.5 pages long)
(1.5 pages long)
Please note that all assigned topics are linked to at least one end of chapter article in the textbook. This is to allow you begin your review process from the related chapter reading before searching recent literature for more on the same topic. In essence, you are required to review all that has been published about your assigned topic within the past three years (2017-2020 inclusive) and in the findings and conclusions section of your paper, you are required to shed some light into how the stream of research has evolved or developed over time,(from when the seminal article contained in the text was written till date (especially the past three years)
To search for scientific articles on your assigned topic, you can use the 'Web of Science' database or the 'Google Scholar' database. While I prefer you use the Web of Science database, I acknowledge the fact that depending on your location or your ability to access a university's electronic database, most of you may not be able to access WOS. Therefore GoogleScholar might be your only option. However irrespective of the platform you choose to or are able to search, it is important that you ensure that only papers published in journals included in the 'Social Sciences Citation Index' (SSCI) are use for your paper. This is because such papers are among the most highly recognized in the social sciences. To find out if a journal is included in the SSCI, please visit the following link:
In the search bar, type in the name of the journal you wish to check, and search. The name of the journal and its active indexations will be revealed. An example has been done for you below:
Also, if you are unable to download certain articles irrespective of the platform you use, try retrieving the DOI number or url of the paper and insert it into DOI search platforms such as SciHub. While this method is frowned upon, it may be the only way out for some students.
ASSIGNED TOPICS & GROUPS
[Date of submission Date: 1st February, 2022/ Presentations: 2nd February, 2022)
Dynamic Capabilities (related end-of-chapter article readings: chapters 2 & 4)
(1) Ahmad Elokaili (ahmad.elokaili@gmail.com)
(2) Zaid Megdad (zaidmgdad23@yahoo.com)
Shared Value (related end-of-chapter article readings: chapters 3)
(1) Kenechukwu ThankGod Okpezune (deblessedtk@gmail.com)
(2) Olatunji Ola (olatunji.ola@std.gau.edu.tr)
Resource Based View of Strategy(related end-of-chapter article readings: chapters 4)
(1) Temitope Ayodeji Atoyebi (temitopeatoyebi002@gmail.com)
(2) Nyota Madhy Mwamba (gbengadan@yahoo.com)
Core competence of Corporations (related end-of-chapter article readings: chapters 5)
(1) Baraa Alkhatib (baraa_ju@yahoo.com)
(2) Mohamad Ezzeddine (ezzeddine.mohamad@live.com)
Organizational Ambidexterity(related end-of-chapter article readings: chapter 7)
(1) Tamara Al-Sharkas
- 09
- 10
- 11
Yes! Users can add video from YouTube or Vimeo with ease:
Enter App Settings
Click the "Manage Questions" button
Click on the question you would like to attach a video to
When editing your answer, click on the video icon and then paste the YouTube or Vimeo video URL
That's it! A thumbnail of your video will appear in answer text box
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
GAU's Fast-Track PhD program is an accelerated version of the regular doctorate program. Designed to be completed in 6 regular semesters, it is designed for individuals who for professional reasons are unable to join the regular program. Only students from countries whose Ministry of Education's policies are compatible with the program structure are enrolled.
- 25
For all intent and purposes academic wise, the Fast-Track PhD program is not different from the regular PhD program. The only distinguishing factor is that the time duration and delivery structure for the Fast-Track program is designed to accomodate the professional demands of enrolled students, since the majority of our students hold regular jobs.
- 26
As earlier stated, the Fast-Track PhD Program is not different from the regular PhD program, and as such all of the accreditations applicable to the regular PhD program equally applies to the Fast-Track program. Again, the term Fast-Track is merely descriptive, and solely describes the accelerated delivery and structure applied for the convenience of the target student population. From an academic standpoint, it is the same in every ramification as the regular program. GAU's PhD in Management program is duly accredited by YOK, YODAK, and ECBE. It is also ranked annually in the eduniversal and webometrics rankings. For Proof of Accreditation, please visit the accreditations page by clicking HERE
- 27
While GAU has a very efficient diploma attestation service through which it helps students attest their diplomas at the Turkish Ministry of Education YOK, students can opt to do it by themselves. We however, recommend the GAU attestation service as it saves students the inconvenience of having to travel to Ankara or of locating nearby Turkish embassies to get it done, and because the university does this as a batch service, it is also more cost effective.
- 28
As applicable to regular students, Fast-Track PhD students are required to take 7 courses + 1 seminar course, after which they are required to sit for the qualification examination. Upon successfully passing the qualification examination, they can then begin working on their theses with their assigned supervisors. You can find the total list of courses you will be responsible for in the course program HERE
- 29
- 30
Again barring any student-induced or globally-induced circumstances, students are guranteed to finish the program within the 6 semesters duration. In other words, if a student fails a course or does not scale through the qualification examination and has to repeat any of them the following semester, it becomes inevitable that the student will exceed the 6 semester duration for the Fast-Track PhD program. Secondly, if a student is unable to meet the publication requirement necessary to graduate, it becomes unavoidable that such a student will take more than the 6 semester duration. We believe this should already be obvious to everyone.
- 31
The university's and faculty's official policy regarding the publication requirement necessary to complete a PhD program is that students must have published a paper originating from their thesis in a journal indexed in the Social Science Citation Index (SSCI). This according to the faculty dean 'is a YOK requirement and any Turkish university whose PhD program is not currently implementing this publication standard is not accredited by YOK'. Thus, Girne American University is not alone in implementing this policy, as the very same policy is applied at all serious minded universities on the island.
- 32
For the qualification examination, students will be required to take a written examination and an oral examination. Both examinations are usually taken days apart from each other, and only students who pass the written examination are allowed to take the oral examination. Professors typically provide students with broad study areas for each course taken in advance, prior to the examination. However, only students who have successfully finished all 7 courses and the seminar will be given this information. If you have not finished your courses yet, most professors will not be willing to provide you with broad study area information.
Finally, the graduate institute's policy is that students who are not successful at their first qualification examination, will be allowed to retake it the following semester. Students who fail the qualification examination twice, will be expelled from the doctorate program.
- 33
- 34
Yes Fast-Track PhD students are provided a flexible deferred fee payment structure. The current structure can be viewed HERE
Again, please note that this is the current fee structure and it is subject to change. Updates will be provided when we receive any such information.
- 35
Sometimes officials at the account office may request that Fast-Track students pay like regular students ignoring the flexible payment structure already in place. When this happens, it is usually because the account officer does not know that the student is a Fast-Track PhD student because as mentioned earlier, 'Fast-Track' is just a term used to identify students enrolled into the accelerated version of the regular PhD program and as such there is nothing to distinguish them from the regular students at the account office.
Therefore, it is very important that when contacting the account office, you state categorically and emphatically that you are a Fast-Track PhD student and you pay according to the Fast-Track PhD program's payment schedule. If you do this, you will avoid situations where you are mistaken for a regular student and asked to pay the regular rates.
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
Welcome to the course module for the BUS 404
(Strategic Management) course!
Please find information about the course below:
1. Assigned Class Textbook: A link to a soft copy of the assigned textbook, for this course can be found HERE
2. Course Outline: We will be covering the following topics:
What Strategy Is and What It Is Not (Chpt 1)
An Overview of the Strategic Management Process
Analysis of Objective Items
Corporate Governance (Chpt 2
Corporate Social Responsibility (Chpt 3)
The External Environment (Chpt 4)
The Internal Environment (Chpt 5)
Strategy Formulation & Choice (Chpts 6 & 8)
Strategy Implementation & Control (Chpts 9 & 11)
3. Topic Portals & Preparing for Class: Each of the topics listed above have a dedicated and password-protected topic web-page that can be assessed via the weekly courses links right after this curriculum section. Passwords to these topic web-pages will be presented to you in advance.
Each topic web-page has 5 sections: Video Lecture, Concept Quiz, Assigned Class Cases, Case Preparation/ Discussion Questions and Final Group Core Case Analysis.
To prepare for class, students are required to (a) Read the assigned chapter for the week and its accompanying PowerPoint slide, (b) Watch the video lecture for the topic, (c) Complete the concept quiz for the topic, (d) Read the assigned class case and (d) Attempt the case preparation questions in preparation for an in-class pasture and discussion of the assigned case for that topic.
Also Note: A link to the PowerPoint Slides accompanying the assigned text book as well as other strategy materials for optional readings can be found on the general materials page HERE. (The materials page requires a password which I will pass along in class)
4. Grading System: The grading system for the course is as follows:
(a) Midterm Examinations: 30%
(b) Weekly Case Preparation Questions: 9% (1.5 x 6)
(c) Weekly Concept Quizzes: 9% (1.5 x 6)
(d) Main Quizzes (2): 12% (6 x 2)
(e) Core Case Analysis (Group): 10%
(f) Final Examination: 30%
4b) More Information about the Core Case Analysis
The Core Case Analysis is a Texbook or Harvard Business Review case assigned to each group (the same groups previously generated for the simulation experience). To see which case has been assigned to your group, please see the list HERE.
You are required to attend to the Core Case assigned to your group every week. In other words after each weekly chapter reading, you are required to analyze the part of the case that corresponds to the topic of the chapter for that week and submit your analysis of only that specific section of the case at the end of the week. Typically every Saturday by midnight (11: 59 PM).
Dealing with the Core Case
Before attempting the Core Case please do the following first.
(i) Read Chapter 12 of the assigned textbook (Suggestions for Case Analysis) (Pg 364)
(ii) Study the Strategic Audit Guide for analysis structure (Pg 34) & methodology (380-382)
(iii) Use the Strategic Audit Worksheet as a quick reference on structure (Pg 374)
(iv) Examine the sample 'Student -Written Strategic Audit' for more on analysis & structure
(Pgs 383-389)
Although you can find the documents mentioned above on the pages of the textbook, for quick access to the full PDF versions of the documents, click on the appropriate thumbnails below:
4c) More Information about the Weekly Concept Quizzes
The weekly concept quizzes are graded stand-alone, chapter-specific, weekly activities aimed at testing conceptual knowledge of the content of the week's topic. These will typically test the most salient learning objectives in each chapter, and may take the form of either multiple choice or essay type questions AND/OR short textual or video case analysis with concept-based questions to be answered (not related to the core case).
4d) More Information about the Weekly Case Preparation Questions
The weekly case preparation questions are graded stand-alone, case-specific, weekly discussion questions aimed at testing your recognition and understanding of how chapter-specific concepts manifest in real business practice. These will typically take the form of graded multiple choice questions (not related to the core case). Students are required to read the assigned weekly cases before class and answer the assigned case preparation questions.
4e) More Information about the Two Main Quizzes
There will only be two quizzes throughout the duration of the course: one before the midterm exams and the other right before the final exams. They will be multiple choice in nature, last for 50minutes and held online at a specific time I will personally announce in the quizzes section on this page. At the stipulated time, everyone must access the quiz or they will lose the opportunity to complete the quiz after the stipulated time has elapsed.
This is all of the information you will need to successfully follow and complete the course this semester. We begin with an introductory session followed by Chapter 2 (Corporate Governance).
Remember that I can be reached by email: lawrenceemeagwali@gau.edu.tr
Good luck!
- 50
- 51
- 52
Please find the two assigned class cases below:
McDonald's Objective Items:
Tesla's Objective Items:
Tesla's Master plan 3 (upcoming)
- 53
Identifying Strategic Issues, Isolating and Analyzing Objective Items:
What is the core strategic issue in the McDonald's Case?
What is the core strategic Issue in the Tesla case?
Read Tesla's objective item documents in the assigned cases section, and using the analysis of objective Item tools in the next section, (a) reverse-isolate Tesla's objective items. (b) analyze the objective items for (i) how realistic they are and (ii) consistency
- 54
Use the following tools to examine and present the core strategic issue (problem) in your assigned class case as well as for your group Core Case Analysis:
To see the case your group has been assigned, please see the list of assigned cases here:
Please note that all of the cases assigned to each of the class groups in the group list above can be found in the assigned class textbook below.
Assigned class textbook:
- 55
- 56
- 57
Assigned Class Cases: Corporate Governance
Please read the following assigned class case and answer the case preparation questions in the following section, using them as the initial foundation for preparing yourself for the in-class pasturing (discussion) of the cases.
- 58
- 59
To examine the corporate governance mechanism for your assigned class case and core case, please use the following tools:
Corporate Governance Analysis Guide
Corporate Governance Analysis Tool
To see the case your group has been assigned, please see the list of assigned cases here:
Please note that all of the cases assigned to each of the class groups in the group list above can be found in the assigned class textbook below.
Assigned class textbook
- 60
Corporate Social Responsibility
This week's online support consists of three sections: (a) Chapter Readings and (b) Assignments . You are required to read the chapter readings and do the assignments.
The Assignments should be completed using a word document submitted via the course portal on GAU's e-learning platform no later than 11.59 PM on Saturday the ___ of ____, 2020.
READINGS:
Please read chapter 3 of the assigned textbook on corporate social responsibilty. Specifically focus on the following three areas (a) Milton Friedman's Perspective (b) Archie Carroll's Perspective and (c) Stakeholder Analysis. You can also use the chapter slide to quickly get the overall gist of the chapter's contents but I recommend that you comprehensively read the chapter. For quick access please click on the thumbnails below to access both the assigned text and the chapter slide:
ASSIGNMENTS
After completing the chapter readings, carry out the following two assignments. These assignments are designed to test your understanding of the core concepts of corporate social responsibility as covered by the readings - especially the three focus areas earlier mentioned.
Assignment 1: Video Case: Nike's Bold and Controversial CSR Moves
This video case presents a historical overview of one of Nike's most profound corporate social responsibility activities: the release of controversial Ads which boldly take on trending social issues. You are required to watch this video case and answer rhe questions that follow.
Case Questions
(1) From the video-case, it is very clear to see that Nike has perfected the art of not only getting involved with trending social issues, but also takes a clear albeit controversial stance and raking in a considerable amount of profit in the proess. Should corporate social responsibility be profit-driven? Disucss.
(2) Considering how profitable this particular type of CSR activity engaged in by companies such as Nike is, and Milton Friedman's position on CSR; in a minimum of 450 words, try convincing Milton Friedman on at least three reasons why businesses should engage in corporate social responsibility without asking him to change his core position.
(3) Which of the different CSR based Nike Ads mentioned in the video case falls within Archie Carroll's ethical or discretionary responsibilities?
(4) IsNike's bold and controversial approach to CSR a model that every business can adopt? Do you think small and medium scale enterprises can and should borrow from this approach? Discuss.
.
Assignment 2: Video Case: Are Electric Cars Really Green?
This second video-case attacks the very notion that sustainability can be associated with the electric car manufacturing industry. In other words, it criticises the widely held notion that renewable energy especially fossil fuel reliant and battery dependent systems are good for the environment. Watch the video case and answer the accompanying questions.
Case Questions
(1) Should green companies such as Tesla whose core business model is designed to produce products that are inherently sustainable, be required to engage in very comprehensive corporate social responsibility activities? Or is the very fact that they claim to produce sustainable products enough? Discuss.
(2) Assume that you are a board member sitting on the ethics and sustainability committee at Tesla or any other electric car manufacturer. List and briefly discuss three top priority corporate social responsibility focus areas you would recommend the organization focuses on.
CORE CASE ACTIVITY
**No core case activity this week!
SUBMITTING YOUR ASSIGNMENTS
To submit your case analysis, proceed to the GAU e-learning platform, enrol into the BUS404 Strategic Management Course, and upload a word document containing your assignments. The link to the e-leaning platform is
http://elearning.gau.edu.tr
For more information, you can send me an email at lawrenceemeagwali@gau.edu.tr
- 61
Examining External Environmental Factors
As usual, this week's online support consists of three sections: (a) Chapter Readings and (b) Assignments and (c) a core case activity. You are required to read the chapter readings and do the assignments and Core-Case activity.
As usual, the assignments should be completed using a word document submitted via GAU's e-learning platform no later than 11.59 PM on Saturday the ___ of _____, 2020.
READINGS:
Please read chapter 4 of the assigned textbook on External Environments. You can also use the chapter slide to quickly get the overall gist of the chapter's contents but as always, I recommend that you read the chapter comprehensively. For quick access please click on the thumbnails below to access both the assigned text and the chapter slide:
ASSIGNMENTS
After completing the chapter readings, carry out the following assignment. This assignment is designed to test your understanding of the core concepts associated with the analysis of the external environment as covered by the readings.
Assignment 1: Written Case: As mentioned during this week's live lesson, factors from the subdomains of the external environment (natural, societal and task) can represent opportunities or threats to organization in a direct or indirect fashion. Most importantly, these factors and trends can be used to develop future scenarios on what industries will look like in the near or far feature, in a bid to helping organizations understand how to position themselves to win in any of those probable futures.
Read the two cases below and analyze their external environments. Your analysis for each of the cases must include (1) a STEEP analysis (2) Issues Priority Matrix (3) Porter's Five Forces Analysis (4) an EFAS table. (click on the image below for a link to a full PDF version of the cases)
SUBMITTING YOUR ASSIGNMENTS
To submit your assignment, proceed to the GAU e-learning platform, enrol into the BUS404 Strategic Management Course, and upload a word document containing your assignment. The link to the e-leaning platform is
http://elearning.gau.edu.tr
For more information, you can send me an email at lawrenceemeagwali@gau.edu.tr
- 62
Based on the following case, complete the following assignment and submit via the e-learning platform.
Russian River Brewing Company in 2016: Positioning Pliny the Younger Craft Beer for Growth
(1) Using Porter's five forces model, describe the competitive conditions in the craft beer industry in 2016. Are Rivals in this industry satisfied with their positions?
(2) Evaluate RRBC's performance and position in the craft beer industry. Generate an IFAS and and EFAS table type of SWOT analysis to support your answer.
For ease of access to the case, please click on the image below:
- 63
Based on the following case, complete the following assignment and submit via the e-learning platform.
Russian River Brewing Company in 2016: Positioning Pliny the Younger Craft Beer for Growth
(1) What Generic Strategy has RRBC followed all these while?
(2) Using the IFAS and EFAS based SWOT analysis tables generated for the Chapter 5 assignment, Generate a unique TOWS Matrix for RRBC, providing it with a minimum of 4 Strategic alternatives it can pursue to enable it make the strategic decision of whether to expand its business or not.
For ease of access to the case, please click on the image below:
- 64
Based on the following case, complete the following assignment and submit via the e-learning platform.
Russian River Brewing Company in 2016: Positioning Pliny the Younger Craft Beer for Growth
(1) What Generic Strategy has RRBC followed all these while?
(2) Using the IFAS and EFAS based SWOT analysis tables generated for the Chapter 5 assignment, Generate a unique TOWS Matrix for RRBC, providing it with a minimum of 4 Strategic alternatives it can pursue to enable it make the strategic decision of whether to expand its business or not.
For ease of access to the case, please click on the image below:
- 65
- 66
- 67
Assigned Class Cases: External Environments
Please read the following assigned class cases using them as the initial foundation for preparing yourself for the in-class pasturing (discussion) of the cases. Please note that the CASE 1 is the core case for this section and it is upon this case that the case preparation questions in the following section are based. CASE 2 and 3 are reinforcement cases. However all three cases are to be read in preparation for in-class pasturing (discussion)
CASE 1 : Conquering the World: One Loaf at a Time
Please read this case and prepare for an in-class analysis and discussion session on all stages of the external environmental analysis
CASE 2 : McDonald's Corporation
Please read this case and prepare for an in-class analysis and discussion session on ONLY the STEEP analysis segment of the external environmental analysis process.
CASE 3 : TESLA Inc.
Please read this case and prepare for an in-class analysis and discussion session on ONLY the Industry analysis (Porter's Five Forces) segment of the external environmental analysis process.
- 68
- 69
Using the External Environments section of the strategy audit document as well as the following analytical tools, analyze the external environment of the focal firm of your assigned core case
Strategic Audit Tools
Strategic Audit Guide
Strategic Audit Worksheet
External Environments Analysis Tools
STEEP Analysis
Issues Priority Matrix
Porter's Five Forces
Industry Matrix
EFAS
To see the case your group has been assigned, please see the list of assigned cases here:
Please note that all of the cases assigned to each of the class groups in the group list above can be found in the assigned class textbook below.
Assigned class textbook
- 70
- 71
- 72
Assigned Class Cases: Internal Environments
Please read the following assigned class case using it as the initial foundation for preparing yourself for the in-class pasturing (discussion) of the cases.
CASE : Conquering the World: One Loaf at a Time
Please read this case and prepare for an in-class analysis and discussion session on all stages of the internal environmental analysis
For ease of access to the case, please click on the link below the image:
- 73
- 74
Using the Internal Environment section of the strategy audit document and the following analytical tools, analyze the internal environment of the focal firm of your assigned core case
Strategic Audit Tools
Strategic Audit Guide
Strategic Audit Worksheet
Internal Environment Analysis Tools
Business Model Analysis
Analysis of Functional Resources and Capabilities
Resources & Capabilities Summary
Assessing Sustainability of Competitive Advantage (VRIO)
Internal Factors Analytic Summary (IFAS)
To see the case your group has been assigned, please see the list of assigned cases here:
Please note that all of the cases assigned to each of the class groups in the group list above can be found in the assigned class textbook below.
Assigned class textbook
- 75
- 76
- 77
Assigned Class Cases: Strategy Formulation
Please read the following assigned class cases and answer the case preparation questions in the following section, using them as the initial foundation for preparing yourself for the in-class pasturing (discussion) of the cases.
CASE : Conquering the World: One Loaf at a Time
For ease of access to the case, please click on the link below the image
- 78
- 79
Using the elements from the Strategy Formulation section of the strategy audit document and the following analytical tools, develop a set of strategic solution alternatives to the identified strategic issue or problem faced by the focal firm of your assigned core case
Strategic Audit Tools
Strategic Audit Guide
Strategic Audit Worksheet
Strategy Formulation Tools
Strategic Factors Analytic Summary
Developing Strategic Alternatives (TOWS Matrix)
To see the case your group has been assigned, please see the list of assigned cases here:
Please note that all of the cases assigned to each of the class groups in the group list above can be found in the assigned class textbook below.
Assigned class textbook
- 80
- 81
- 82
- 83
- 84
- 85
Welcome to the course module for the MGMT 502
(Strategic Management) course!
Before we begin, I would like to bring to your attention the following important changes made to the curriculum.
1. Blackboard Live lectures: Live lectures will be held at regular class times. Please enrol into the BUS 404 course on the GAU E-learning platform to access the BB Live portal
2. Course Outline: We will be covering the same courses as outlined on this main course page HERE.However, we are excluding the quizzes this semester.
3. Grading System: In light of the changes mentioned above, the new grading system is now as follows:
(a) Midterm Examinations: 50%
(f) Final Examination: 50%
Remember that I can be reached by email: lawrenceemeagwali@gau.edu.tr
Good luck and stay safe!
- 86
- 87
- 88
Please find the two assigned class cases below:
McDonald's Objective Items:
Tesla's Objective Items:
Tesla's Master plan 3 (upcoming)
- 89
Identifying Strategic Issues, Isolating and Analyzing Objective Items:
What is the core strategic issue in the McDonald's Case?
What is the core strategic Issue in the Tesla case?
Read Tesla's objective item documents in the assigned cases section, and using the analysis of objective Item tools in the next section, (a) reverse-isolate Tesla's objective items. (b) analyze the objective items for (i) how realistic they are and (ii) consistency
- 90
Use the following tools to examine and present the core strategic issue (problem) in your assigned class case as well as for your group Core Case Analysis:
To see the case your group has been assigned, please see the list of assigned cases here:
Please note that all of the cases assigned to each of the class groups in the group list above can be found in the assigned class textbook below.
Assigned class textbook
- 91
- 92
- 93
Assigned Class Cases: Corporate Governance
Please read the following assigned class case and answer the case preparation questions in the following section, using them as the initial foundation for preparing yourself for the in-class pasturing (discussion) of the cases.
- 94
- 95
To examine the corporate governance mechanism for your assigned class case and core case, please use the following tools:
Corporate Governance Analysis Guide
Corporate Governance Analysis Tool
To see the case your group has been assigned, please see the list of assigned cases here:
Please note that all of the cases assigned to each of the class groups in the group list above can be found in the assigned class textbook below.
Assigned class textbook:
- 96
Corporate Social Responsibility
This week's online support consists of three sections: (a) Chapter Readings and (b) Assignments . You are required to read the chapter readings and do the assignments.
The Assignments should be completed using a word document submitted via the course portal on GAU's e-learning platform no later than 11.59 PM on Saturday the ___ of ____, 2020.
READINGS:
Please read chapter 3 of the assigned textbook on corporate social responsibilty. Specifically focus on the following three areas (a) Milton Friedman's Perspective (b) Archie Carroll's Perspective and (c) Stakeholder Analysis. You can also use the chapter slide to quickly get the overall gist of the chapter's contents but I recommend that you comprehensively read the chapter. For quick access please click on the thumbnails below to access both the assigned text and the chapter slide:
ASSIGNMENTS
After completing the chapter readings, carry out the following two assignments. These assignments are designed to test your understanding of the core concepts of corporate social responsibility as covered by the readings - especially the three focus areas earlier mentioned.
Assignment 1: Video Case: Nike's Bold and Controversial CSR Moves
This video case presents a historical overview of one of Nike's most profound corporate social responsibility activities: the release of controversial Ads which boldly take on trending social issues. You are required to watch this video case and answer rhe questions that follow.
Case Questions
(1) From the video-case, it is very clear to see that Nike has perfected the art of not only getting involved with trending social issues, but also takes a clear albeit controversial stance and raking in a considerable amount of profit in the proess. Should corporate social responsibility be profit-driven? Disucss.
(2) Considering how profitable this particular type of CSR activity engaged in by companies such as Nike is, and Milton Friedman's position on CSR; in a minimum of 450 words, try convincing Milton Friedman on at least three reasons why businesses should engage in corporate social responsibility without asking him to change his core position.
(3) Which of the different CSR based Nike Ads mentioned in the video case falls within Archie Carroll's ethical or discretionary responsibilities?
(4) IsNike's bold and controversial approach to CSR a model that every business can adopt? Do you think small and medium scale enterprises can and should borrow from this approach? Discuss.
.
Assignment 2: Video Case: Are Electric Cars Really Green?
This second video-case attacks the very notion that sustainability can be associated with the electric car manufacturing industry. In other words, it criticises the widely held notion that renewable energy especially fossil fuel reliant and battery dependent systems are good for the environment. Watch the video case and answer the accompanying questions.
Case Questions
(1) Should green companies such as Tesla whose core business model is designed to produce products that are inherently sustainable, be required to engage in very comprehensive corporate social responsibility activities? Or is the very fact that they claim to produce sustainable products enough? Discuss.
(2) Assume that you are a board member sitting on the ethics and sustainability committee at Tesla or any other electric car manufacturer. List and briefly discuss three top priority corporate social responsibility focus areas you would recommend the organization focuses on.
CORE CASE ACTIVITY
**No core case activity this week!
SUBMITTING YOUR ASSIGNMENTS
To submit your case analysis, proceed to the GAU e-learning platform, enrol into the BUS404 Strategic Management Course, and upload a word document containing your assignments. The link to the e-leaning platform is
http://elearning.gau.edu.tr
For more information, you can send me an email at lawrenceemeagwali@gau.edu.tr
- 97
Examining External Environmental Factors
As usual, this week's online support consists of three sections: (a) Chapter Readings and (b) Assignments and (c) a core case activity. You are required to read the chapter readings and do the assignments and Core-Case activity.
As usual, the assignments should be completed using a word document submitted via GAU's e-learning platform no later than 11.59 PM on Saturday the ___ of _____, 2020.
READINGS:
Please read chapter 4 of the assigned textbook on External Environments. You can also use the chapter slide to quickly get the overall gist of the chapter's contents but as always, I recommend that you read the chapter comprehensively. For quick access please click on the thumbnails below to access both the assigned text and the chapter slide:
ASSIGNMENTS
After completing the chapter readings, carry out the following assignment. This assignment is designed to test your understanding of the core concepts associated with the analysis of the external environment as covered by the readings.
Assignment 1: Written Case: As mentioned during this week's live lesson, factors from the subdomains of the external environment (natural, societal and task) can represent opportunities or threats to organization in a direct or indirect fashion. Most importantly, these factors and trends can be used to develop future scenarios on what industries will look like in the near or far feature, in a bid to helping organizations understand how to position themselves to win in any of those probable futures.
Read the two cases below and analyze their external environments. Your analysis for each of the cases must include (1) a STEEP analysis (2) Issues Priority Matrix (3) Porter's Five Forces Analysis (4) an EFAS table. (click on the image below for a link to a full PDF version of the cases)
SUBMITTING YOUR ASSIGNMENTS
To submit your assignment, proceed to the GAU e-learning platform, enrol into the BUS404 Strategic Management Course, and upload a word document containing your assignment. The link to the e-leaning platform is
http://elearning.gau.edu.tr
For more information, you can send me an email at lawrenceemeagwali@gau.edu.tr
- 98
Based on the following case, complete the following assignment and submit via the e-learning platform.
Russian River Brewing Company in 2016: Positioning Pliny the Younger Craft Beer for Growth
(1) Using Porter's five forces model, describe the competitive conditions in the craft beer industry in 2016. Are Rivals in this industry satisfied with their positions?
(2) Evaluate RRBC's performance and position in the craft beer industry. Generate an IFAS and and EFAS table type of SWOT analysis to support your answer.
For ease of access to the case, please click on the image below:
- 99
Based on the following case, complete the following assignment and submit via the e-learning platform.
Russian River Brewing Company in 2016: Positioning Pliny the Younger Craft Beer for Growth
(1) What Generic Strategy has RRBC followed all these while?
(2) Using the IFAS and EFAS based SWOT analysis tables generated for the Chapter 5 assignment, Generate a unique TOWS Matrix for RRBC, providing it with a minimum of 4 Strategic alternatives it can pursue to enable it make the strategic decision of whether to expand its business or not.
For ease of access to the case, please click on the image below:
- 100
Based on the following case, complete the following assignment and submit via the e-learning platform.
Russian River Brewing Company in 2016: Positioning Pliny the Younger Craft Beer for Growth
(1) What Generic Strategy has RRBC followed all these while?
(2) Using the IFAS and EFAS based SWOT analysis tables generated for the Chapter 5 assignment, Generate a unique TOWS Matrix for RRBC, providing it with a minimum of 4 Strategic alternatives it can pursue to enable it make the strategic decision of whether to expand its business or not.
For ease of access to the case, please click on the image below:
- 101
- 102
- 103
Assigned Class Cases: External Environments
Please read the following assigned class cases using them as the initial foundation for preparing yourself for the in-class pasturing (discussion) of the cases. Please note that the CASE 1 is the core case for this section and it is upon this case that the case preparation questions in the following section are based. CASE 2 and 3 are reinforcement cases. However all three cases are to be read in preparation for in-class pasturing (discussion)
CASE 1 : Conquering the World: One Loaf at a Time
Please read this case and prepare for an in-class analysis and discussion session on all stages of the external environmental analysis
CASE 2 : McDonald's Corporation
Please read this case and prepare for an in-class analysis and discussion session on ONLY the STEEP analysis segment of the external environmental analysis process.
CASE 3 : TESLA Inc.
Please read this case and prepare for an in-class analysis and discussion session on ONLY the Industry analysis (Porter's Five Forces) segment of the external environmental analysis process.
- 104
- 105
Using the External Environments section of the strategy audit document as well as the following analytical tools, analyze the external environment of the focal firm of your assigned core case
Strategic Audit Tools
Strategic Audit Guide
Strategic Audit Worksheet
External Environments Analysis Tools
STEEP Analysis
Issues Priority Matrix
Porter's Five Forces
Industry Matrix
EFAS
To see the case your group has been assigned, please see the list of assigned cases here:
Please note that all of the cases assigned to each of the class groups in the group list above can be found in the assigned class textbook below.
Assigned class textbook
- 106
- 107
- 108
Assigned Class Cases: Internal Environments
Please read the following assigned class case using it as the initial foundation for preparing yourself for the in-class pasturing (discussion) of the cases.
CASE : Conquering the World: One Loaf at a Time
Please read this case and prepare for an in-class analysis and discussion session on all stages of the internal environmental analysis
For ease of access to the case, please click on the link below the image:
- 109
- 110
Using the Internal Environment section of the strategy audit document and the following analytical tools, analyze the internal environment of the focal firm of your assigned core case
Strategic Audit Tools
Strategic Audit Guide
Strategic Audit Worksheet
Internal Environment Analysis Tools
Business Model Analysis
Analysis of Functional Resources and Capabilities
Resources & Capabilities Summary
Assessing Sustainability of Competitive Advantage (VRIO)
Internal Factors Analytic Summary (IFAS)
To see the case your group has been assigned, please see the list of assigned cases here:
Please note that all of the cases assigned to each of the class groups in the group list above can be found in the assigned class textbook below.
Assigned class textbook
- 111
- 112
- 113
Assigned Class Cases: Strategy Formulation
Please read the following assigned class cases and answer the case preparation questions in the following section, using them as the initial foundation for preparing yourself for the in-class pasturing (discussion) of the cases.
CASE : Conquering the World: One Loaf at a Time
For ease of access to the case, please click on the link below the image
- 114
- 115
Using the elements from the Strategy Formulation section of the strategy audit document and the following analytical tools, develop a set of strategic solution alternatives to the identified strategic issue or problem faced by the focal firm of your assigned core case
Strategic Audit Tools
Strategic Audit Guide
Strategic Audit Worksheet
Strategy Formulation Tools
Strategic Factors Analytic Summary
Developing Strategic Alternatives (TOWS Matrix)
To see the case your group has been assigned, please see the list of assigned cases here:
Please note that all of the cases assigned to each of the class groups in the group list above can be found in the assigned class textbook below.
Assigned class textbook
- 116
- 117
- 118
- 119
Welcome to the new online course module for the BUS 404
(Strategic Management) course!
Before we begin, I would like to bring to your attention the following important changes made to the curriculum.
1. ZOOM live lectures: Live lectures will be held at regular class times. Please enrol into the BUS 404 course on the GAU E-learning platform to access the Zoom meeting ID and password.
2. Course Outline: We will be covering the same courses as outlined on the main course page HERE.However, we are excluding the simulation component of the program and replacing it with 'Weekly Assignments' and 'Quizzes'.
3. Grading System: In light of the changes mentioned above, the new grading system is now as follows:
(a) Midterm Examinations: 30%
(b) Core Case Analysis: 15%
(c) Weekly Assignments: 10%
(d) Quizzes (2): 10%
(d) Final Examination: 35%
3b) More Information about the Core Case Analysis (*Not required for FAll 2020 students)
The Core Case Analysis is a Texbook case assigned to each group (the same groups previously generated for the simulation experience). To see which case has been assigned to your group, please see the list HERE.
You are required to attend to the Core Case assigned to your group every week. In other words after each weekly chapter reading, you are required to analyze the part of the case that corresponds to the topic of the chapter for that week and submit your analysis of only that specific section of the case at the end of the week. Typically every Saturday by midnight (11: 59 PM).
Dealing with the Core Case
Before attempting the Core Case please do the following first.
(i) Read Chapter 12 of the assigned textbook (Suggestions for Case Analysis) (Pg 364)
(ii) Study the Strategic Audit Guide for analysis structure (Pg 34) & methodology (380-382)
(iii) Use the Strategic Audit Worksheet as a quick reference on structure (Pg 374)
(iv) Examine the sample 'Student -Written Strategic Audit' for more on analysis & structure
(Pgs 383-389)
Although you can find the documents mentioned above on the pages of the textbook, for quick access to the full PDF versions of the documents, click on the appropriate thumbnails below:
3c) More Information about the Weekly Assignments
The weekly assignments are graded stand-alone, chapter-specific, weekly activities aimed at testing conceptual knowledge of the content of the week's topic. These will typically test the most salient learning objectives in each chapter, and may take the form of either essay type questions AND/OR short textual or video case analysis with concept-based questions to be answered (not related to the core case).
3d) More Information about the Two Quizzes
There will only be two quizzes throughout the duration of the course: one before the midterm exams and the other right before the final exams. They will be multiple choice in nature, last for 50minutes and held online at a specific time I will personally announce in the quizzes section on this page. At the stipulated time, everyone must access the quiz or they will lose the opportunity to complete the quiz after the stipulated time has elapsed.
This is all of the information you will need to successfully follow and complete the course this semester. We begin with an introductory session followed by Chapter 2 (Corporate Governance).
Remember that I can be reached by email: lawrenceemeagwali@gau.edu.tr
Good luck and stay safe!
- 120
Welcome to the new online course module for the MGMT 502
(Strategic Management) course!
Before we begin, I would like to bring to your attention the following important changes made to the curriculum.
1. ZOOM live lectures: Live lectures will be held at regular class times. Please enrol into the MGMT 502 course on the GAU E-learning platform to access the Zoom meeting ID and password.
2. Course Outline: We will be covering the same courses as outlined on the main course page HERE.However, we will be excluding the simulation component of the program and replacing it with 'Weekly Assignments' and 'Quizzes'.
3. Grading System: In light of the changes mentioned above, the new grading system is now as follows:
(a) Midterm Examinations: 30% (40% Fall, 2020)
(b) Core Case Analysis: 15% (None Fall, 2020)
(c) Weekly Assignments: 10% (10% Fall, 2020)
(d) Quizzes (2): 10% (10% Fall, 2020)
(d) Final Examination: 35% (40%, Fall, 2020)
3b) More Information about the Core Case Analysis (*NOT applicable to Fall, 2020)
The Core Case Analysis is a Texbook case assigned to each group (the same groups previously generated for the simulation experience). To see which case has been assigned to your group, please see the list HERE.
You are required to attend to the Core Case assigned to your group every week. In other words after each weekly chapter reading, you are required to analyze the part of the case that corresponds to the topic of the chapter for that week and submit your analysis of only that specific section of the case at the end of the week. Typically every Saturday by midnight (11: 59 PM).
Dealing with the Core Case
Before attempting the Core Case please do the following first.
(i) Read Chapter 12 of the assigned textbook (Suggestions for Case Analysis) (Pg 364)
(ii) Study the Strategic Audit Guide for analysis structure (Pg 34) & methodology (380-382)
(iii) Use the Strategic Audit Worksheet as a quick reference on structure (Pg 374)
(iv) Examine the sample 'Student -Written Strategic Audit' for more on analysis & structure
(Pgs 383-389)
Although you can find the documents mentioned above on the pages of the textbook, for quick access to the full PDF versions of the documents, click on the appropriate thumbnails below:
3c) More Information about the Weekly Assignments
The weekly assignments are graded stand-alone, chapter-specific, weekly activities aimed at testing conceptual knowledge of the content of the week's topic. These will typically test the most salient learning objectives in each chapter, and may take the form of either essay type questions AND/OR short textual or video case analysis with concept-based questions to be answered (not related to the core case).
3d) More Information about Two Quizzes
There will only be two quizzes throughout the duration of the course: one before the midterm exams and the other right before the final exams. They will be multiple choice in nature, last for 50minutes and held online at a specific time I will personally announce in the quizzes section on this page. At the stipulated time, everyone must access the quiz or they will lose the opportunity to complete the quiz after the stipulated time has elapsed.
This is all of the information you will need to successfully follow and complete the course this semester. We begin with an introductory session and then proceed with Chapter 2 (Corporate Governance).
Remember that I can be reached by email: lawrenceemeagwali@gau.edu.tr
Good luck and stay safe!
- 121
Welcome to the online support portal for the BUS 401
(International Business Management) course
As previously explained the course consists of readings and assignments. You are required to read the assigned chapters in the assigned textbook and answer the conceptual questions that follow.
Please note that the instructions and questions have been placed on this portal for easy access. However, you are required to submit your answers on the e-learning platform.The e-learning platform for BUS401 will be open by noon tomorrow (Friday 24th), and will be ready to accept your submissions.
# Grading System: In light of the changes mentioned above, the new grading system is now as follows:
(a) Chpt 1: International Business & Globalization: 20%
(b) Chpt 2: Culture: 20%
(c) Chpt 3: Governmental & Legal Systems: 20%
(d) Chpt 4: Economic Systems & Market Methods: 20%
(d) Chpt 12: Strategies for International Business: 20%
29.07.2020 @ 11.59PM
05.08.2020 @ 11.59PM
12.08.2020 @ 11.59PM
** Please note that due to the limited time available, reading through the slides to solve the assignments is allowed. However, consult the full text for deeper understanding. A link to an eversion of the text is available in all of the chapter sections on this web page.
International Business: Environment & Operations by John D. Daniels, Lee H. Radebugh & Daniel P. Sullivan. 16th eds. Please find a link to the textbook here. (you can also find a link to it as well as corresponding slides in the chapter sections on this page)
Remember that I can be reached by email: lawrenceemeagwali@gau.edu.tr
Good luck and stay safe!
- 122
Understanding Corporate Governance
This week's online support consists of three sections: (a) Chapter Readings, and (b) Weekly Assignments. You are required to read the chapter readings and do the assignmentsthat follow.
The Assignments should be completed using a word document submitted via the course portal on GAU's e-learning platform no later than 11.59 PM on Saturday the ___ of ____, 2020.
READINGS:
Please read chapter 2 of the assigned textbook on corporate governance if you have not done so already (remember I had asked the class to read this chapter just before the lock-down). You can also use the chapter slide to quickly get the overall gist of the chapter's contents but I recommend that you comprehensively read the chapter. For quick access please click on the thumbnails below to access both the assigned text and the chapter slide:
ASSIGNMENTS
After completing the chapter readings, carry out the following three assignments. These assignments are designed to test your understanding of the core concepts of corporate governance as covered in the readings.
Assignment 1: Written Case: Identifying good corporate governance practices
This initial assignment consists of three short cases from Latin America representing situations where corporations have revamped their corporate governance practices to improve investor confidence. In general you are required to read them and spot the corporate governance changes made and resultant effect of the changes on the organizaion's bottom line. Please click on the image below to access the cases, then answer the case questions beside the image.
Case Questions
For all three cases ( Cemento Argos, Buenaventura and CPFL Energia)
(1) Identify the core corporate governance issues they were faced with
(2) List all actions taken by these companies to turn their corporate governance around
(3) List and discuss the impact of these actions on the bottom line of these companies
Assignment 2: Written Case: Identifying corporate governance issues
This second assignment is the same one I had previously asked everyone to read ahead of class and come prepared to discuss in class. It presents the contemporary case of corporate governance at TESLA inc. You are required to read the case again if you have not already done so, and answer the related case questions. Click on the image below to access the case again if you don't already have it.
Case Questions
(1) In paragraph 3, proxy advisory firms were strongly against the re-election of current Tesla board members and supported the splitting of Musk's role as CEO and chairman of the board.
(i) Argue in favor of their position
(ii) Given Musk's reputation for innovatively revolutionalizing industries, argue against their position
(2) Tesla's board of directors:
(i) How independent is Tesla's board?
(ii) How has the current state of independence of Tesla's board influenced the disclosure issue at hand?
(3) From a corporate governance regulations perspective-in particular the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, how did Elon Musk's August 7th tweet violate financial disclosure regulations?
(4) Seeing the prominence of social media in the 21st century, should social media channels such as Twitter, Facebook, Instagram and LinkedIn be considered legal avenues for disclosing corporate information to stakeholders- especially investors?
Assignment 3: Video Case: Serious Corporate Governance Scandals
This third case- a video case, represents a classical example of bad corporate governance as reflected in the case of Enron. You are required to watch the video and answer the accompanying case questions.
Case Questions
(1) Describe Enron's Corporate governance from the lens of agency theory.
(2) Would the Enron scandal have occured if the Sarbane Oxley Act of 2002 were in place at the time? Explain why/why not.
(3) It is clear that the Enron scandal was fraught with the perpertuation of financial fraud and bad corporate disclosure practices.
(i) what financial and accounting practice laid the foundation upon which the scandal could thrive?
(ii) what eventually led to the demise of Enron?
(4) What is the role of audit firms such as Arthur Andersen & Co in corporate governance?
(ii) Criticize the role of Arthur Anderson & Co in the Enron Scandal.
CORE CASE ACTIVITY (NOTE** FALL 2020 students are NOT required to do this)
In line with the new course outline, each group in the case group (previously simulation group) is required to comprehensively complete the analysis of a CORE CASE using the case analysis and preparation guide in Tab number 1 (the welcome tab) . These cases are contained within the assigned text book. To discover the specific case I have assigned to your group, access the list of groups and assigned cases HERE.
For Chapter 2: You are required to follow the Strategic Audit Guide and analyze the corporate governance issues in your assigned CORE CASE. While you can find a copy of the Strategic Audit Guide HERE, I recommend going through Week 1's tab (the tab that says 'Welcome to BUS404 in the Covid-19 Semester') as it contains links to more materials that can help you analyze the case.
NOTE: You are to complete ONLY section II of the Srategic Audit
SUBMITTING YOUR ASSIGNMENTS
To submit your assignment, proceed to the GAU e-learning platform, enrol into the BUS404 Strategic Management Course, and upload a word document containing your assignment. The link to the e-leaning platform is
http://elearning.gau.edu.tr
For more information, you can send me an email at lawrenceemeagwali@gau.edu.tr
- 123
This week's online support consists of two sections: (a) Chapter Readings, (b) Assignments. You are required to read the chapter readings and do the assignments that follow.
Assignments should be completed using a word document submitted via the e-learning platform. This first assignment is due no later than 11.59 PM on Wednesday the 29th of July, 2020.
READINGS:
Please read chapter 1 of the assigned textbook on International Business & Globalization. Owing to time constraints, you can also use the chapter slide to quickly get the overall gist of the chapter's contents but I recommend that you comprehensively read the chapter where possible. For quick access please click on the thumbnails below to access both the assigned text and the chapter slide:
ASSIGNMENTS
After completing the chapter readings, answer the following five questions. These questions are designed to test your understanding of the core concepts in International Business & Globalization, as covered in the readings.
1) Over the past two decades, the volume of global trade has sharply risen. One reason for this trend is direct the increase in numberof local businesses willing to engage in cross-border international business and trade. From your understanding of the assigned reading, (a)define international business and (b) discuss the primary reasons companies engage in international business.
2) As stated in question 1 above, the number of local businesses willing to engage in cross-border trade has risen in recent decades. (a) what three factors have largely contributed to this willingness to engage in international trade and hence, the increased growth in international business observed in recent times? (b)which of the three factors do you think has been the most important and why?
3) While international business involves local businesses engaging in cross border trade, it also involves foreign businesses investing in foreign countries. From your understanding of the assigned reading, (a) what is foreign direct investment? And (b) what social factors in the external environment might affect FDI?
4) There are different types of organizations which engage in some form of international business or the other. One of such business formations is the multinational enterprise (MNE). From your understanding of the assigned reading, (a) define an MNE (b) how do physical and social factors affect how an MNE functions in a foreign country?
5) In a short essay, identify and explain three competitive factors that influence international businesses.
SUBMITTING YOUR ASSIGNMENTS
To submit your assignment, enrol into the BUS 401 course on the e-learning platform. You will find submission links there. For any wuestions, please do not hesitate to contact me via email: lawrenceemeagwali@gau.edu.tr
Please do not send the word files directly to my email as our official email addresses have very limited storage. ONLY submit via the e-learning platform.
- 124
Understanding Corporate Governance
This week's online support consists of three sections: (a) Chapter Readings, (b) Assignments and (c) Core-Case Activity. You are required to read the chapter readings and do the assignments that follow.
The Assignments should be completed using a word document submitted via the course portal on GAU's e-learning platform no later than 11.59 PM on Saturday the ___ of _____, 2020.
READINGS:
Please read chapter 2 of the assigned textbook on corporate governance if you have not done so already (remember I had asked the class to read this chapter just before the lock-down). You can also use the chapter slide to quickly get the overall gist of the chapter's contents but I recommend that you comprehensively read the chapter. For quick access please click on the thumbnails below to access both the assigned text and the chapter slide:
ASSIGNMENTS
After completing the chapter readings, carry out the following three assignments. These assignments are designed to test your understanding of the core concepts of corporate governance as covered in the readings.
Assignment 1: Written Case: Identifying good corporate governance practices
This initial assignment consists of three short cases from Latin America representing situations where corporations have revamped their corporate governance practices to improve investor confidence. In general you are required to read them and spot the corporate governance changes made and resultant effect of the changes on the organization's bottom line. Please click on the image below to access the cases, then answer the case questions underneath the image.
Case Questions
For all three cases ( Cemento Argos, Buenaventura and CPFL Energia)
(1) Identify the core corporate governance issues they were faced with
(2) List all actions taken by these companies to turn their corporate governance around
(3) List and discuss the impact of these actions on the bottom line of these companies
Assignment 2: Written Case: Identifying corporate governance issues
This second assignment is the same one I had previously asked everone to read ahead of class and come prepared to discuss in class. It presents the contemporary case of corporate governance at TESLA inc. You are required to read the case again if you have not already done so, and answer the related case questions. Click on the image below to access the case again if you don't already have it.
Case Questions
(1) In paragraph 3, proxy advisory firms were strongly against the re-election of current Tesla board members and supported the splitting of Musk's role as CEO and chairman of the board.
(i) Argue in favor of their position
(ii) Given Musk's reputation for innovatively revolutionalizing industries, argue against their position
(2) Tesla's board of directors:
(i) How independent is Tesla's board?
(ii) How has the current state of independence of Tesla's board influenced the disclosure issue at hand?
(3) From a corporate governance regulations perspective-in particular the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, how did Elon Musk's August 7th tweet violate financial disclosure regulations?
(4) Seeing the prominence of social media in the 21st century, should social media channels such as Twitter, Facebook, Instagram and LinkedIn be considered legal avenues for disclosing corporate information to stakeholders especially investors?
Assignment 3: Video Case: Serious Corporate Governance Scandals
This third case- a video case, represents a classical example of bad corporate governance as reflected in the case of Enron. You are required to watch the video and answer the accompanying case questions.
Case Questions
(1) Describe Enron's Corporate governance from the lens of agency theory.
(2) Would the Enron scandal have occured if the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 were in place at the time? Explain why/why not.
(3) It is clear that the Enron scandal was fraught with the perpertuation of financial fraud and bad corporate disclosure practices.
(i) what financial and accounting practice laid the foundation upon which the scandal could thrive?
(ii) what eventually led to the demise of Enron?
(4) What is the role of audit firms such as Arthur Andersen & Co in corporate governance?
(ii) Criticize the role of Arthur Anderson & Co in the Enron Scandal.
CORE CASE ACTIVITY (NOTE** not applicable to Fall, 2020 students)
In line with the new course outline, each group in the case group (previously simulation group) is required to comprehensively complete the analysis of a CORE CASE using the case analysis and preparation guide in Tab number 1 (the welcome tab) . These cases are contained within the assigned text book. To discover the specific case I have assigned to your group, access the list of groups and assigned cases HERE.
For Chapter 2: You are required to follow the Strategic Audit Guide and analyze the corporate governance issues in your assigned CORE CASE. While you can find a copy of the Strategic Audit Guide HERE, I recommend reading going through Week 1's tab (the tab that says 'Welcome to MGMT502 in the Covid-19 Semester') as it contains links to more materials that can help you analyze the case.
NOTE: You are to complete ONLY section II of the Srategic Audit
SUBMITTING YOUR ASSIGNMENTS
To submit your case analysis, proceed to the GAU e-learning platform, enrol into the MGMT502 Strategic Management Course, and upload a word document containing your assignments. The link to the e-leaning platform is
http://elearning.gau.edu.tr
For more information, you can send me an email at lawrenceemeagwali@gau.edu.tr
- 125
Corporate Social Responsibility
This week's online support consists of two sections: (a) Chapter Readings, (b) Assignments. You are required to read the chapter readings and do the assignments that follow.
Assignments should be completed using a word document submitted via the e-learning platform. This first assignment is due no later than 11.59 PM on Wednesday the 5th of July, 2020.
READINGS:
Please read chapter 2 of the assigned textbook on Culture. Owing to time constraints, you can also use the chapter slide to quickly get the overall gist of the chapter's contents but I recommend that you comprehensively read the chapter where possible. For quick access please click on the thumbnails below to access both the assigned text and the chapter slide:
ASSIGNMENTS
After completing the chapter readings, answer the following eight questions. These questions are designed to test your understanding of the core concepts in Culture, as covered in the readings.
1) From the assigned reading, discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using a nation as a point of reference for a culture?
2) Cultural differences have a great impact on the success of international business ventures. (a) Explain the difference between a monochronic and polychronic culture? (b) explain how such cultural differences affect business practices for international firms?
3) An individual’s status is in part determined by a set of individual factors and in part by the individual’s affiliations to or membership in certain groups. In a short essay, describe the various affiliations upon which a person's status can be based and discuss how social stratification affects such business functions as marketing and employment practices.
4) Motivation differs from one country to another. From your understanding of the assigned reading, describe the four major theories which explain why this is so.
5) Using examples, describe the characteristics of individualist and collectivist cultures.
6) Information plays an important role in international business dealings. From your understanding of the assigned reading, (a) what is the difference between a low-context culture and a high-context culture? (b) how do these differences affect communication in international business dealings?
7) One of the most common occurrences in international business dealings from a culture perspective is culture shock. (a) define culture shock and (b) explain how an international employer can help prevent culture shock and improve the success of expatriates.
8) Explain the difference between a polycentric, ethnocentric, and geocentric approach to international management? What key factors should a firm consider before adopting one of these approaches?
SUBMITTING YOUR ASSIGNMENTS
To submit your assignment, enrol into the BUS 401 course on the e-learning platform. You will find submission links there. For any wuestions, please do not hesitate to contact me via email: lawrenceemeagwali@gau.edu.tr
Please do not send the word files directly to my email as our official email addresses have very limited storage. ONLY submit via the e-learning platform.
- 126
Corporate Social Responsibility
This week's online support consists of three sections: (a) Chapter Readings and (b) Assignments . You are required to read the chapter readings and do the assignments.
The Assignments should be completed using a word document submitted via GAU's e-learning platform no later than 11.59 PM on Saturday the ____of ______, 2020.
READINGS:
Please read chapter 3 of the assigned textbook on corporate social responsibilty. Specifically focus on the following three areas (a) Milton Friedman's Perspective (b) Archie Carroll's Perspective and (c) Stakeholder Analysis. You can also use the chapter slide to quickly get the overall gist of the chapter's contents but I recommend that you comprehensively read the chapter. For quick access please click on the thumbnails below to access both the assigned text and the chapter slide:
ASSIGNMENTS
After completing the chapter readings, carry out the following two assignments. These assignments are designed to test your understanding of the core concepts of corporate social responsibility as covered by the readings - especially the three focus areas earlier mentioned.
Assignment 1: Video Case: Nike's Bold and Controversial CSR Moves
This video case presents a historical overview of one of Nike's most profound corporate social responsibility activities: the release of controversial Ads which boldly take on trending social issues. You are required to watch this video case and answer rhe questions that follow.
Case Questions
(1) From the video-case, it is very clear to see that Nike has perfected the art of not only getting involved with trending social issues, but also takes a clear albeit controversial stance and raking in a considerable amount of profit in the proess. Should corporate social responsibility be profit-driven? Disucss.
(2) Considering how profitable this particular type of CSR activity engaged in by companies such as Nike is, and Milton Friedman's position on CSR; in a minimum of 450 words, try convincing Milton Friedman on at least three reasons why businesses should engage in corporate social responsibility without asking him to change his core position.
(3) Which of the different CSR based Nike Ads mentioned in the video case falls within Archie Carroll's ethical or discretionary responsibilities?
(4) Is Nike's bold and controversial approach to CSR a model that every business can adopt? Do you think small and medium scale enterprises can and should borrow from this approach? Discuss.
Assignment 2: Video Case: Are Electric Cars Really Green?
This second video-case attacks the very notion that sustainability can be associated with the electric car manufacturing industry. In other words, it criticises the widely held notion that renewable energy especially fossil fuel reliant and battery dependent systems are good for the environment. Watch the video case and answer the accompanying questions.
Case Questions
(1) Should green companies such as Tesla whose core business model is designed to produce products that are inherently sustainable, be required to engage in very comprehensive corporate social responsibility activities? Or is the very fact that they claim to produce sustainable products enough? Discuss.
(2) Assume that you are a board member sitting on the ethics and sustainability committee at Tesla or any other electric car manufacturer. List and briefly discuss three top priority corporate social responsibility focus areas you would recommend the organization focuses on.
CORE CASE ACTIVITY
**No core case activity this week!
SUBMITTING YOUR ASSIGNMENTS
To submit your case analysis, proceed to the GAU e-learning platform, enrol into the MGMT502 Strategic Management Course, and upload a word document containing your assignments. The link to the e-leaning platform is
http://elearning.gau.edu.tr
For more information, you can send me an email at lawrenceemeagwali@gau.edu.tr
- 127
Corporate Social Responsibility
This week's online support consists of three sections: (a) Chapter Readings and (b) Assignments . You are required to read the chapter readings and do the assignments.
The Assignments should be completed using a word document submitted via the course portal on GAU's e-learning platform no later than 11.59 PM on Saturday the ___ of ____, 2020.
READINGS:
Please read chapter 3 of the assigned textbook on corporate social responsibilty. Specifically focus on the following three areas (a) Milton Friedman's Perspective (b) Archie Carroll's Perspective and (c) Stakeholder Analysis. You can also use the chapter slide to quickly get the overall gist of the chapter's contents but I recommend that you comprehensively read the chapter. For quick access please click on the thumbnails below to access both the assigned text and the chapter slide:
ASSIGNMENTS
After completing the chapter readings, carry out the following two assignments. These assignments are designed to test your understanding of the core concepts of corporate social responsibility as covered by the readings - especially the three focus areas earlier mentioned.
Assignment 1: Video Case: Nike's Bold and Controversial CSR Moves
This video case presents a historical overview of one of Nike's most profound corporate social responsibility activities: the release of controversial Ads which boldly take on trending social issues. You are required to watch this video case and answer rhe questions that follow.
Case Questions
(1) From the video-case, it is very clear to see that Nike has perfected the art of not only getting involved with trending social issues, but also takes a clear albeit controversial stance and raking in a considerable amount of profit in the proess. Should corporate social responsibility be profit-driven? Disucss.
(2) Considering how profitable this particular type of CSR activity engaged in by companies such as Nike is, and Milton Friedman's position on CSR; in a minimum of 450 words, try convincing Milton Friedman on at least three reasons why businesses should engage in corporate social responsibility without asking him to change his core position.
(3) Which of the different CSR based Nike Ads mentioned in the video case falls within Archie Carroll's ethical or discretionary responsibilities?
(4) IsNike's bold and controversial approach to CSR a model that every business can adopt? Do you think small and medium scale enterprises can and should borrow from this approach? Discuss.
.
Assignment 2: Video Case: Are Electric Cars Really Green?
This second video-case attacks the very notion that sustainability can be associated with the electric car manufacturing industry. In other words, it criticises the widely held notion that renewable energy especially fossil fuel reliant and battery dependent systems are good for the environment. Watch the video case and answer the accompanying questions.
Case Questions
(1) Should green companies such as Tesla whose core business model is designed to produce products that are inherently sustainable, be required to engage in very comprehensive corporate social responsibility activities? Or is the very fact that they claim to produce sustainable products enough? Discuss.
(2) Assume that you are a board member sitting on the ethics and sustainability committee at Tesla or any other electric car manufacturer. List and briefly discuss three top priority corporate social responsibility focus areas you would recommend the organization focuses on.
CORE CASE ACTIVITY
**No core case activity this week!
SUBMITTING YOUR ASSIGNMENTS
To submit your case analysis, proceed to the GAU e-learning platform, enrol into the BUS404 Strategic Management Course, and upload a word document containing your assignments. The link to the e-leaning platform is
http://elearning.gau.edu.tr
For more information, you can send me an email at lawrenceemeagwali@gau.edu.tr
- 128
Examining External Environmental Factors
As usual, this week's online support consists of three sections: (a) Chapter Readings and (b) Assignments and (c) a core case activity. You are required to read the chapter readings and do the assignments and Core-Case activity.
As usual, the assignments should be completed using a word document submitted via GAU's e-learning platform no later than 11.59 PM on Saturday the ___ of _____, 2020.
READINGS:
Please read chapter 4 of the assigned textbook on External Environments. You can also use the chapter slide to quickly get the overall gist of the chapter's contents but as always, I recommend that you read the chapter comprehensively. For quick access please click on the thumbnails below to access both the assigned text and the chapter slide:
ASSIGNMENTS
After completing the chapter readings, carry out the following assignment. This assignment is designed to test your understanding of the core concepts associated with the analysis of the external environment as covered by the readings.
Assignment 1: Written Case: As mentioned during this week's live lesson, factors from the subdomains of the external environment (natural, societal and task) can represent opportunities or threats to organization in a direct or indirect fashion. Most importantly, these factors and trends can be used to develop future scenarios on what industries will look like in the near or far feature, in a bid to helping organizations understand how to position themselves to win in any of those probable futures.
Read the two cases below and analyze their external environments. Your analysis for each of the cases must include (1) a STEEP analysis (2) Issues Priority Matrix (3) Porter's Five Forces Analysis (4) an EFAS table. (click on the image below for a link to a full PDF version of the cases)
SUBMITTING YOUR ASSIGNMENTS
To submit your assignment, proceed to the GAU e-learning platform, enrol into the BUS404 Strategic Management Course, and upload a word document containing your assignment. The link to the e-leaning platform is
http://elearning.gau.edu.tr
For more information, you can send me an email at lawrenceemeagwali@gau.edu.tr
- 129
Government & Legal Systems
This week's online support consists of two sections: (a) Chapter Readings, (b) Assignments. You are required to read the chapter readings and do the assignments that follow.
Assignments should be completed using a word document submitted via the e-learning platform. This third assignment is due no later than 11.59 PM on Wednesday the 5th of August, 2020.
READINGS:
Please read chapter 3 of the assigned textbook on Government & Legal Systems. Owing to time constraints, you can also use the chapter slide to quickly get the overall gist of the chapter's contents but I recommend that you comprehensively read the chapter where possible. For quick access please click on the thumbnails below to access both the assigned text and the chapter slide:
ASSIGNMENTS
After completing the chapter readings, answer the following four questions. These questions are designed to test your understanding of the core concepts on Governments & Legal Systems, as covered in the readings.
1) Individualism and collectivism are two major doctrines in international business. (a) explain the distinguishing features between the two (b) what is the relationship between government and business under each orientation?
2) What is procedural political risk? How does a nation's political and legal environment influence procedural risk for MNEs?
3) Compare and contrast the rule of law and the rule of man.
4) The legal environment of nations plays a significant role in international business dealings. Explain how a nation's legal environment might affect an MNE's marketplace behavior, especially when the rule of man prevails?
SUBMITTING YOUR ASSIGNMENTS
To submit your assignment, enrol into the BUS 401 course on the e-learning platform. You will find submission links there. For any wuestions, please do not hesitate to contact me via email: lawrenceemeagwali@gau.edu.tr
Please do not send the word files directly to my email as our official email addresses have very limited storage. ONLY submit via the e-learning platform.
- 130
Examining External Environmental Factors
As usual, this week's online support consists of three sections: (a) Chapter Readings and (b) Assignments and (c) a core case activity. You are required to read the chapter readings and do the assignments and Core-Case activity.
As usual, the assignments should be completed using a word document submitted via GAU's e-learning platform but no later than 11.59 PM on Saturday the ___of ____, 2020.
READINGS:
Please read chapter 4 of the assigned textbook on External Environments. You can also use the chapter slide to quickly get the overall gist of the chapter's contents but as always, I recommend that you read the chapter comprehensively. For quick access please click on the thumbnails below to access both the assigned text and the chapter slide:
ASSIGNMENTS
After completing the chapter readings, carry out the following assignment. This assignment is designed to test your understanding of the core concepts associated with the analysis of the external environment as covered by the readings.
Assignment 1: Written Case: As mentioned during this week's live lesson, factors from the subdomains of the external environment (natural, societal and task) can represent opportunities or threats to organization in a direct or indirect fashion. Most importantly, these factors and trends can be used to develop future scenarios on what industries will look like in the near or far feature, in a bid to helping organizations understand how to position themselves to win in any of those probable futures.
The McKinsey report below presents four brief and near-term scenarios on the likely outlook of the Covid-19 pandemic on the African continent and how the pandemic will affect its constituent nations. You are required to read the report (click on the image below for a link to a full PDF version of the report) and answer the questions that follow:
Assignment Questions
(1) Which of the four scenarios in the McKinsey report above, do you think is most likely to happen?
(2) How can African firms with flexible production lines in the manufacturing sector keep themselves liquid and ensure business continuity irrespective of whichever scenario eventually manifests?
(3) Given the current geopolitical dynamics of the global oil industry and the resultant crash in oil prices, and hence that of the GDP of oil producing African countries; what can oil companies in countries such as Nigeria do to mitigate the loss of revenue -which although initiated by the ongoing geopolotical price war, will likely be exarcebated by the Covid-19 pandemic?
(4) What opportunities does the geopolitical situation presented in question number 3 above present for transportation companies and chemical manufacturing companies located in non-oil producing countries?
(5) List some of the opportunities and threats small and medium scale enterprises in Africa are likely to face if any of the four Covid-19 scenarios in the report manifests.
CORE CASE ACTIVITY (NOTE** Not applicable to FAll, 2020 students)
You are required to conduct an analysis of the external environment of your assigned group case using section III of the strategic audit as a guide. However, please note that in order to give you more time to prepare for the quiz, you are not required to submit the these assignments this saturday. The assignment and core-case activity for WEEK 4 should be submitted next Saturday the 18th of April, 2020 by 11:59 pm.
SUBMITTING YOUR ASSIGNMENTS
To submit your assignment, proceed to the GAU e-learning platform, enrol into the MGMT502 Strategic Management Course, and upload a word document containing your assignment. The link to the e-leaning platform is
http://elearning.gau.edu.tr
For more information, you can send me an email at lawrenceemeagwali@gau.edu.tr
- 131
Economic Systems & Market Methods
This week's online support consists of two sections: (a) Chapter Readings, (b) Assignments. You are required to read the chapter readings and do the assignments that follow.
Assignments should be completed using a word document submitted via the e-learning platform. This first assignment is due no later than 11.59 PM on Wednesday the 12th of August, 2020.
READINGS:
Please read chapter 1 of the assigned textbook on Economic Systems & Market Methods. Owing to time constraints, you can also use the chapter slide to quickly get the overall gist of the chapter's contents but I recommend that you comprehensively read the chapter where possible. For quick access please click on the thumbnails below to access both the assigned text and the chapter slide:
ASSIGNMENTS
After completing the chapter readings, answer the following eight questionss. These questions are designed to test your understanding of the core concepts in Economic Systems and Market Methods, as covered in the readings.
1) What are some of the problems and issues which complicate international economic analysis?
2) When analyzing a country's economic development, performance, and potential why is economic freedom an important factor to consider?
3) What is state capitalism? Why do you think state capitalism is becoming increasingly popular around the world?
4) Explain the difference between a command economy and state capitalism
5) Define economic freedom. What factors are used in the Economic Freedom Index? For managers, what role does the Economic Freedom Index play in analyzing the potential of a country?
6) Describe the three ways economies can be categorized.
7) What general characteristics of a country should managers consider when analyzing an economic environment? What specific indicators help managers measure the economic development, performance, and potential of a country?
8) With the aid of a clear example, define gross national income and (b) explain how it is calculated
SUBMITTING YOUR ASSIGNMENTS
To submit your assignment, enrol into the BUS 401 course on the e-learning platform. You will find submission links there. For any wuestions, please do not hesitate to contact me via email: lawrenceemeagwali@gau.edu.tr
Please do not send the word files directly to my email as our official email addresses have very limited storage. ONLY submit via the e-learning platform.
- 132
- 133
Strategies for International Business
This week's online support consists of two sections: (a) Chapter Readings, (b) Assignments. You are required to read the chapter readings and do the assignments that follow.
Assignments should be completed using a word document submitted via the e-learning platform. This first assignment is due no later than 11.59 PM on Wednesday the 12th of August, 2020.
READINGS:
Please read chapter 1 of the assigned textbook on Strategies for International Business. Owing to time constraints, you can also use the chapter slide to quickly get the overall gist of the chapter's contents but I recommend that you comprehensively read the chapter where possible. For quick access please click on the thumbnails below to access both the assigned text and the chapter slide:
ASSIGNMENTS
After completing the chapter readings, answer the following six questions. These questions are designed to test your understanding of the core concepts in Strategies for International Business, as covered in the readings.
1) In a brief essay, discuss the strategy used by Zara, the firm described in the opening case. Also discuss the features of Zara's value chain.
2) Describe the two basic ways that companies can create value. What role does the value chain play in these methods?
3) What is the difference between primary and secondary activities in the value chain? Describe the functions of configuration and coordination in these value activities.
4) What is configuration? Briefly list and discuss the factors that influence value chain configuration.
5) Describe the pressures for local responsiveness that international companies face.
Answer: The two main pressures for local responsiveness that international companies face are consumer divergence and host-government policies.
6) Discuss the characteristics of international, localization, global, and transnational strategies. Include situations and a specific example in which each strategy would be most appropriate.
SUBMITTING YOUR ASSIGNMENTS
To submit your assignment, enrol into the BUS 401 course on the e-learning platform. You will find submission links there. For any wuestions, please do not hesitate to contact me via email: lawrenceemeagwali@gau.edu.tr
Please do not send the word files directly to my email as our official email addresses have very limited storage. ONLY submit via the e-learning platform.
- 134
- 135
Based on the following case, complete the following assignment and submit via the e-learning platform.
Russian River Brewing Company in 2016: Positioning Pliny the Younger Craft Beer for Growth
(1) Using Porter's five forces model, describe the competitive conditions in the craft beer industry in 2016. Are Rivals in this industry satisfied with their positions?
(2) Evaluate RRBC's performance and position in the craft beer industry. Generate an IFAS and and EFAS table type of SWOT analysis to support your answer.
For ease of access to the case, please click on the image below:
- 136
Based on the following case, complete the following assignment and submit via the e-learning platform.
Russian River Brewing Company in 2016: Positioning Pliny the Younger Craft Beer for Growth
(1) Using Porter's five forces model, describe the competitive conditions in the craft beer industry in 2016. Are Rivals in this industry satisfied with their positions?
(2) Evaluate RRBC's performance and position in the craft beer industry. Generate an IFAS and and EFAS table type of SWOT analysis to support your answer.
For ease of access to the case, please click on the image below:
- 137
Based on the following case, complete the following assignment and submit via the e-learning platform.
Russian River Brewing Company in 2016: Positioning Pliny the Younger Craft Beer for Growth
(1) What Generic Strategy has RRBC followed all these while?
(2) Using the IFAS and EFAS based SWOT analysis tables generated for the Chapter 5 assignment, Generate a unique TOWS Matrix for RRBC, providing it with a minimum of 4 Strategic alternatives it can pursue to enable it make the strategic decision of whether to expand its business or not.
For ease of access to the case, please click on the image below:
- 138
- 139
Based on the following case, complete the following assignment and submit via the e-learning platform.
Russian River Brewing Company in 2016: Positioning Pliny the Younger Craft Beer for Growth
(1) What Generic Strategy has RRBC followed all these while?
(2) Using the IFAS and EFAS based SWOT analysis tables generated for the Chapter 5 assignment, Generate a unique TOWS Matrix for RRBC, providing it with a minimum of 4 Strategic alternatives it can pursue to enable it make the strategic decision of whether to expand its business or not.
For ease of access to the case, please click on the image below:
- 140
- 141
- 142
- 143
The key to conducting any successful quantitative analysis in management lies in choosing a suitable research topic. A suitable research topic is one within which the problem of the study is clearly and unambiguously reflected. It thus follows that before deriving a suitable research topic one must first of all determine an appropriate research problem. An appropriate research problem is one which provides clear and unambiguous answers to the following key questions and steps:
What problem does your research intends to address? (if you have no answer to this question then there will be no need to conduct a research on it. Similarly, if the answer to this question is not crystal clear then the means of addressing it will not be clear)
Why is this problem relevant? (In other words, why should we care about this problem? Is the issue(s) it deals with currently contemporary, trending, emerging or considered important to a scholars or practitioners? – No need to re-invent the wheel if it is not broken)
Which other prominent researchers have tackled this problem in the recent past? (Identify the most influential and recent papers which have studied the problem or a similar one. Almost every quantitative research problem has been dealt with in the past. Identify them. On very rare occasions you find a research problem that no one has dealt with in the past.)
How have other studies failed to completely examine the problem in question? (what are the current gaps in the existing body of literature?)
How do you intend to contribute to literature by filling one or more of these gaps in extant research? (In other words, how would you design a study that would provide answers to questions pertaining to the gaps in literature you decide to fill, and why is such a study design appropriate?)
What are the primary variables involved in the research problem you have chosen? (In other words, identify the key variables as well as secondary ones, and identify their nature within the context of the research problem e.g: dependent, independent etc.)
Who is your target population and how do you intend to collect the appropriate data? (Where necessary, indicate an appropriate target population from which you intend to collect data to study the problem. Also, determine what sampling procedures you intend to use and determine which data collection instruments would be appropriate for collecting your data.)
Write a research topic (Your research topic should be no more than 9 words and should clearly capture your research problem and primary variables)
CALL TO ACTION: Now it’s your turn. Use the 8 steps outlined above to develop a suitable research topic for your research. Submit your topic using the button below
(Culled from SW)
- 144
Models are key to the successful conduct of quantitative research. In general, theoretical and conceptual models are the most common models needed for the clear illustration of concepts and relationships under study. The following 10 steps provide guidance on the development of quantitative research models:
Steps in formulating a conceptual model (From existing literature)
1. Identify and define your dependent variables. These should be the outcome(s) of the phenomenon you are interested in better understanding. They should be the effected thing(s) in your research questions.
2. Figure out why explaining and predicting these DVs is important.
Why should we care?
For whom will it make a difference?
What can we possibly contribute to knowledge that is not already known?
If these are all answerable and suggest continuing the study, then go to #3, otherwise, go to #1 and try different DVs.
3. Form one or two research questions around explaining and predicting these DVs.
Scoping your research questions may also require you to identify your population.
4. Is there some existing theory that would help explore these research questions?
If so, then how can we adopt it for specifically exploring these research questions?
Does that theory also suggest other variables we are not considering?
5. What do you think (and what has research said) impacts the DVs we have chosen?
These become IVs.
6. What is it about these IVs that is causing the effect on the DVs?
These become Mediators.
7. Do these relationships depend on other factors, such as age, gender, race, religion, industry, organization size and performance, etc.?
These become Moderators
8. What variables could potentially explain and predict the DVs, but are not directly related to our interests?
These become control variables. These are often some of those moderators like age and gender, or variables in extant literature.
9. Identify your population.
Do you have access to this population?
Why is this population appropriate to sample in order to answer the research questions?
10. Based on all of the above, but particularly #4, develop an initial conceptual model involving the IVs, DVs, Mediators, Moderators, and Controls.
If tested, how will this model contribute to research (make us think differently) and practice (make us act differently)?
CALL TO ACTION: Now it’s your turn. Use the 10 steps outlined above to develop a suitable conceptual framework for your research.
(Culled from SW)
- 145
You need to find ways to measure the constructs you want to include in your model. Usually this is done through reflective latent measures on a Likert scale. It is conventional and encouraged to leverage existing scales that have already been either proposed or, better yet, validated in extant literature. If you can’t find existing scales that match your construct, then you might need to develop your own.
E1. Find existing scales
A convenient way to find existing scales for management research is to go to:
Google Scholar
Handbook of Management Scales
E2. Where necessary, adapt the scales to suit your context. (maintain the ‘spirit’ of the construct/ report the fact that you adapted your scales)
E3. Where necessary, Trim the scale as needed.
Reflective constructs rarely ever requires more than 4 or 5 items.
Select the 4-5 items that best capture the construct of interest.
If the scale is multidimensional, it is likely formative. In this case, you can either:
Keep the entire scale (this can greatly inflate your survey, but it allows you to use a latent structure)
Keep only one dimension (just pick the one that best reflects the construct you are interested in)
Keep one item from each dimension (this allows you to create an aggregate score; i.e., sum, average, or weighted average)
N1. Develop new scales
Precisely define your construct. You cannot develop new measures for a construct if you do not know precisely what it is you are hoping to measure.
Once you have defined your construct, develop scales (reflective rather than formative where possible, as formative are a bit more complicated to analyze from a statistical perspective)
For reflective measures, simply create 5 interchangeable statements that can be measured on a 5-point Likert scale of agreement, frequency, or intensity. We develop 5 items so that we have some flexibility in dropping 1 or 2 during the EFA if needed. If the measures are truly reflective, using more than 5 items would be unnecessarily redundant.
E2. If developing your own scales, do pretesting
To ensure the newly developed scales make sense to others and will hopefully measure the construct you think they should measure, you need to do some pretesting. Two very common pretesting exercises are ‘talk-aloud’ and ‘Q-sort’.
Talk-aloud exercises include sitting down with between five and eight individuals who are within, or close to, your target population. For example, if you plan on surveying marketers, then you should do talk-alouds with marketers. If you are surveying a more difficult to access population, such as CEOs, you can probably get away with doing talk-alouds with upper level management instead. The purpose of the talk-aloud is to see if the newly developed items make sense to others. Invite the participant (just one participant at a time) to read out loud each item and respond to it. If they struggle to read it, then it is worded poorly. If they have to think very long about how to answer, then it needs to be more direct. If they are unsure how to answer, then it needs to be clarified. If they say “well, it depends” then it needs to be simplified or made more contextually specific. You get the idea. After the first talk-aloud, revise your items accordingly, and then do the second talk-aloud. Repeat until you stop getting meaningful corrections.
Q-sort is an exercise where the participant (ideally from the target population, but not strictly required) has a card (physical or digital) for each item in your survey, even existing scales. They then sort these cards into piles based on what construct they think the item is measuring. To do this, you’ll need to let them know your constructs and the construct definitions. This should be done for formative and reflective constructs, but not for non-latent constructs (e.g., gender, industry, education). You should have at least 8 people participate in the Q-sort. If you arrive at consensus (>70% agreement between participants) after the first Q-sort, then move on. If not, identify the items that did not achieve adequate consensus, and then try to reword them to be more conceptually distinct from the construct they miss-loaded on while being more conceptually similar to the construct they should have loaded on. Repeat the Q-sort (with different participants) until you arrive at adequate consensus.
E3. Identify target sample and obtain approval to collect data
1. Conduct a Pilot Study
It is exceptionally helpful to conduct a pilot study if time and target population permit. A pilot study is a smaller data collection effort (between 30 and 100 participants) used to obtain reliability scores (like Cronbach’s alpha) for your reflective latent factors, and to confirm the direction of relationships, as well as to do preliminary manipulation checks (where applicable). Usually the sample size of a pilot study will not allow you to test the full model (either measurement or structural) altogether, but it can give you sufficient power to test pieces at a time. For example, you could do an EFA with 20 items at a time, or you could run simple linear regressions between an IV and a DV.
Often time and target population do not make a pilot study feasible. For example, you would never want to cannibalize your target population if that population is difficult to access and you are concerned about final sample size.. If the results of the pilot study reveal poor Cronbach’s alphas, or poor loadings, or significant cross-loadings, you should revise your items accordingly. Poor Cronbach’s alphas and poor loadings indicate too much conceptual inconsistency between the items within a construct. Significant cross-loadings indicate too much conceptual overlap between items across separate constructs.
2. Collect Data
Data collection could take anywhere from 1 week to three months, depending on many factors. Be prepared to send reminders or give incentives. Also be prepared to only obtain a fraction of the responses you expected. Your response rate is what matters the most
CALL TO ACTION: Now it’s your turn. Use the steps outlined above to develop a suitable research questionnaire for your study
(Culled from SW)
- 146
- 147
- 148
- 149
PRACTICAL QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS SECTION
Please find below the analytical models and SPSS datasets for use in the practical section of the course. The analytical model and spss daset for masters students is different from that assigned to doctoral students. Please see the relevant section applicapble to you below:
MASTERS STUDENTS (MGMT510)
Master's students are required to carry out the analysis using the following analytical model and SPSS dataset on purchase intention. As you will find in the documents attached, you are to carryout all of the analytical steps up until multiple regression. You are not required to do the structural equation modeling analysis.
DOCTORATE STUDENTS (MGMT610)
Doctorate students are required to carry out the analysis using the following analytical model and SPSS dataset on organizational performance. As you will find in the documents attached, you are to carryout all of the analytical steps up until structural equation modeling analysis.
- 150
Please click below to access the sample questionnaire for this section
The dataset used in this secton will be emailed to you.
- 151
- 152
- 153
- 154
- 155
- 156
A practical introduction to conducting variance-based structural equation modeling using the SmartPLS software. This section contains three videos:
(a) Data Importation and Initial Model Estimation: Generating .csv versions of Spss files, importing .csv files inot SmartPLS and specifying the initial structual model in SEM
(b) Assessing the Measurement Model: Assessing the psychometric propertices of the data collection instrument and the quality of the collected data by examining reliability, convergent validity and discriminant validity
(c) Assessing the Structural Model: Assessing the direct and indirect effects of the final structural model including (i) Direct path analysis (ii) Indirect effects: Mediation (iii) Indirect effects: Moderation
- 157
Reporting the Results of a PLS-SEM Analysis: The main items to report, the structure and relevant methodological citations.
Note: The focal analytical report presented in the video was based on the same analytical procedure taught in this course, however, the content of the report presented in the video below, are excerpts from an actual paper developed together with a student of mine and which is currently under review at an SSCI journal. It is provided here only because the same PLS-SEM analytical procedure I have taught in this class was used to both analyze and develop the report section for the paper. The sole aim is to show you the structure, order, format, content and approach to developing and interpreting the results section of a PLS-SEM analysis. It is meant to serve as a starting point for developing your report and as such, excluded other key report sections not relevant to this course, as only the core sections of a PLS_SEM report are presented. As such, I will not be providing the class with the actual paper. Feel free to pause the video and obseve the format of each section and use it as a guide to developing your initial report.